The National Trust also presented yesterday – their report is attached.

My main take aways from that session were

• They feel very strongly that the new tunnel must go under the Citylink road tunnel (that crosses under St Kilda Rd near the Melbournian).
• They feel very strongly about the trees and made several very well reasoned arguments.  But they accept some will/should go and work must go into replacements.  They even said that the value of the trees is much higher than replacement trees and that Metro Rail should provide funding for extra amenities to compensate.
• 157-national-trust-submission-in-chief-to-ees-hearing

George Swinburne (Jan’s cousin) made the attached presentation yesterday on behalf of himself and the Hallmark OC.  Covers a lot of issues that we have in common.  158-submission-to-advisory-committee-on-behalf-of-the-hallmark-and-gg-and-mj-swinburne-19-sept-2016

It is worth noting that it has been emphasized several times that having the same issue raised multiple times does not change the value of the argument – if it is a good idea mentioned by just one submitter then it will be considered.

This presentation was made a few days back and reported fairly widely, but the actual document has only been released today, worth rreading.155-city-of-port-phillip-additional-documents

The submission by The Botanica is scheduled to be made this coming week – 10am to 1pm Wednesday 21st September.  It is open to the public and held at : Mercure Hotel Treasury Gardens, 13 Spring Street, Melbourne

Why not come and listen!!

Spent the morning listening to Melb Uni submission.  They are v concerned about noise / vibration, thought it may be relevant to us.

They have an internal team of six full time staff plus some heavy hitting legal help…our barrister is part of their team.

An interesting pickup by their legal team was the lack of consistency in the various documentation.  Things like ….in some instances Metro Rail say that they will ‘avoid’ an issue and in other places they will ‘minimise’ the issue.  Didn’t seem to be logical reasonas for difference, almost simply different authors.  But it is more than grammar as ‘avoid’ obviously is much stronger than minimise.

Their vibration issues are more dramatic than ours – if their medical research equipment is impacted then they cannot operate and cannot easily relocate it.  At least with us, even if we’re unhappy, they can offer us a suite at the Sofitel.

One of their likely impacted labs is where they do infectious disease research (Ebola and the like)…hmm don’t want problems there!!

Other good comparison for us…they have concerns about their carpark access too!

I’m hopeful that the things they found, get generalised and placed into the EPRs will help us!!

Having met up unexpectedly at the EES Panel hearing on Wed, Jan Swinburne & Simon Adams, MMRA’s Domain Precinct manager, got together on Friday to discuss the current devts associated with the Domain Station construction.

• Tree removal: The number of trees likely to be removed as part of the Domain Station construction has been considerably reduced with each tree removal now needing to be justified. In other good news, MMRA has engaged sustainability experts from LOCI to focus on the trees –  http://loci.melbourne Every effort will be made to maximise the likelihood of trees thriving. Appropriate soil type & depth as well as irrigation will be required for all tree plantings.
• Albert Reserve: MMRA has managed to reduce the impact on the Albert Reserve. It is likely that some trees, including the Windsor Oak, will not need to be removed. The Boer War Monument will need to be removed & stored during station construction. No decision has yet been reached on its final location.
• Acoustic shed: MMRA believes that the acoustic shed to be built in St Kilda Rd will protect Botanica from much (how much??) of the Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) & construction noise. Simon was receptive to Jan’s suggestions of the shed being painted with trees or having vertical gardens.
• Traffic flows during construction: Possible routes are still being worked on as are plans for Kings Way, Punt Rd, Canterbury Rd & Ferrars St to take up re-routed traffic. To allow station construction to take place, vehicle & bike lanes in St Kilda Rd are relatively easy to move, tram tracks obviously less so. Need to avoid creating curves which would result in tram screeching adding to the noise. Provision is being made for Botanica residents to access our St Kilda Rd driveway either via Bowen Lane or Bowen Cres depending on station construction requirements. Access to the city, Albert Park etc should be possible via Albert Rd during construction.
• Traffic flows into the future: MMRA recognises that current traffic flows in this area are problematic for drivers, cyclists & pedestrians. Efforts are being made to work with the relevant authorities to improve future layout & traffic flows as part of the station project. This includes consulting with VicRoads re the current St Kilda Rd Safety Improvement Study.

Great summary, thanks Jan

As many of you would recall, there was a stack of drilling late 2015 and early 2016.  This included a lot of drilling right on our doorstep.  My understanding of how this works is something like this

• Metro Rail do a stack of drilling
• They also do some modelling.  Essentially they try and work out how hard the digging will be and what risks they are likely to encounter.
• They send the models and the data to the short listed bidders.
• The short listed bidders are told – we think you have enough information to prepare you bids (ie lock in your price).  If you don’t think you have enough information, let us know and we will do some more.

Well you’ll notice some more drilling lately.  As I understand it, this is a result of the short listed bidders saying….”That area near the NGV, we need some more drill samples there.”

It shows the process at work and gives me some comfort that things are working.  I’m also pleased to see that none of the extra drilling is near us (to date)…means all the bidders think this part is not of concern to them.   And remember that this is three separate consortium working independently.

Today City of PP presented – Very balanced, presented by Claire Ferres Miles

They noted that they had already closed many of their issues but some remained.  Here are my notes

1. Trees
   • Concerned about number being removed
   • Understand that Metro Rail have reduced number from 223 to lower number – want an update
   • Picked up my request – trees that are removed must be replaced as early as possible and not waited until the project end
   • It is not an economic issue, dollars to do trees right is small in respect to overall project cost
2. Overall Domain precinct
   • Want grander thinking, not JUST the station.  Think more broadly
   • Expand changes as far as Kings Way (esp near Toorak Rd corner)
   • Consider bike linkages
   • Right but feels like City of PP trying to get funds from this for their projects….not unreasonable
   • Boer War memorial – holding firm that move, store and replace is right.  I agree.
3. Lots on bikes
   • 70% of trips in City of PP are less than 5km
   • Need to speed up St Kilda Rd transport study
   • Want Park St tram link done as part of early works, will help with moving more onto trams during construction and beyond
   • Current plan at Domain Station is 25 bike loops.  City of PP want 400 on Day 1 and provision for massive expansion if it takes off
4. Cavern versus Cut and Cover
   • They are satisfied that Cut and Cover is right
   • Less spoil
   • Less trucks
   • Less time
   • Difference in tree removal is very low
5. Chiller in Albert Rd
   • Feels poor location
   • Incorporate into a building
   • Also consider if any power substation is required and do it as part of project
6. Planning processes
   • Quite a lot of discussion on the process that will occur during the construction
   • Needs to be fair / transparent and workable

At the hearings today, the Chair tabled a number of issues that she demanded extra information from the Metro Rail Authority.  She listed out around 15-16 issues and they will be formalised over the next 24 hours, I managed to capture the main ones that apply to us.

On the days that I have attended this has not occurred before.  I suspect it is to try and get some movement on these issues during the process and not waiting until the end.  It clearly shows that the issues are material enough to warrant more attention.

1. Traffic modelling for Domain precinct
2. Route of tunnel – under or over Citylink.  If it goers over Citylink, what is tree plan.
3. How they will handle Silica / Asbestos / Aspergillus
4. Ground water impacts
5. Station design for floods
6. Resident management guide – especially as it applies to acoustics

Items 1, 2, 3 and 6 were all ones that our barrister raised when cross examining the MMRA experts.

After talking to a few residents, I realised that many of you have not had time to read the various documents about the Metro Rail tunnel.  Here’s a crash course via YouTube videos – but be aware that these are ‘promotional’ videos and obviously show the project in its best possible light.  But they are very informative.

The first one gives an idea of the ‘hole’ we will have outside our building where the TBM will be launched.  You see it at about 50 seconds into this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2NJHI4ZmR8

The second one is about much of the pre-tunnel work.  Something to note is the acoustic shed that they show (this one at City North).  Something like this is proposed outside our building.  It will be around 3 storey’s high.  Unsightly but designed to contain the noise and dust.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1HFLQa4-qY

This one shows some graphics of possible Domain Station.  Note that it is not proposed to have any commercial premises inside Domain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dm8T5-ndP3E

This site has a full collection of videos on Metro Rail https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYkhAqVHk4Q-8kIgwMla2vw

And finally if you search for London Crossrail there are heaps of videos of a similar project in London.