The submission by The Botanica is scheduled to be made this coming week – 10am to 1pm Wednesday 21st September. It is open to the public and held at : Mercure Hotel Treasury Gardens, 13 Spring Street, Melbourne
Why not come and listen!!
The submission by The Botanica is scheduled to be made this coming week – 10am to 1pm Wednesday 21st September. It is open to the public and held at : Mercure Hotel Treasury Gardens, 13 Spring Street, Melbourne
Why not come and listen!!
Spent the morning listening to Melb Uni submission. They are v concerned about noise / vibration, thought it may be relevant to us.
They have an internal team of six full time staff plus some heavy hitting legal help…our barrister is part of their team.
An interesting pickup by their legal team was the lack of consistency in the various documentation. Things like ….in some instances Metro Rail say that they will ‘avoid’ an issue and in other places they will ‘minimise’ the issue. Didn’t seem to be logical reasonas for difference, almost simply different authors. But it is more than grammar as ‘avoid’ obviously is much stronger than minimise.
Their vibration issues are more dramatic than ours – if their medical research equipment is impacted then they cannot operate and cannot easily relocate it. At least with us, even if we’re unhappy, they can offer us a suite at the Sofitel.
One of their likely impacted labs is where they do infectious disease research (Ebola and the like)…hmm don’t want problems there!!
Other good comparison for us…they have concerns about their carpark access too!
I’m hopeful that the things they found, get generalised and placed into the EPRs will help us!!
Having met up unexpectedly at the EES Panel hearing on Wed, Jan Swinburne & Simon Adams, MMRA’s Domain Precinct manager, got together on Friday to discuss the current devts associated with the Domain Station construction.
Great summary, thanks Jan
As many of you would recall, there was a stack of drilling late 2015 and early 2016. This included a lot of drilling right on our doorstep. My understanding of how this works is something like this
Well you’ll notice some more drilling lately. As I understand it, this is a result of the short listed bidders saying….”That area near the NGV, we need some more drill samples there.”
It shows the process at work and gives me some comfort that things are working. I’m also pleased to see that none of the extra drilling is near us (to date)…means all the bidders think this part is not of concern to them. And remember that this is three separate consortium working independently.
Today City of PP presented – Very balanced, presented by Claire Ferres Miles
They noted that they had already closed many of their issues but some remained. Here are my notes
At the hearings today, the Chair tabled a number of issues that she demanded extra information from the Metro Rail Authority. She listed out around 15-16 issues and they will be formalised over the next 24 hours, I managed to capture the main ones that apply to us.
On the days that I have attended this has not occurred before. I suspect it is to try and get some movement on these issues during the process and not waiting until the end. It clearly shows that the issues are material enough to warrant more attention.
Items 1, 2, 3 and 6 were all ones that our barrister raised when cross examining the MMRA experts.
After talking to a few residents, I realised that many of you have not had time to read the various documents about the Metro Rail tunnel. Here’s a crash course via YouTube videos – but be aware that these are ‘promotional’ videos and obviously show the project in its best possible light. But they are very informative.
The first one gives an idea of the ‘hole’ we will have outside our building where the TBM will be launched. You see it at about 50 seconds into this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2NJHI4ZmR8
The second one is about much of the pre-tunnel work. Something to note is the acoustic shed that they show (this one at City North). Something like this is proposed outside our building. It will be around 3 storey’s high. Unsightly but designed to contain the noise and dust.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1HFLQa4-qY
This one shows some graphics of possible Domain Station. Note that it is not proposed to have any commercial premises inside Domain.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dm8T5-ndP3E
This site has a full collection of videos on Metro Rail https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYkhAqVHk4Q-8kIgwMla2vw
And finally if you search for London Crossrail there are heaps of videos of a similar project in London.
I have been browsing today and I see that a Technical Note has been published last week that has an overall timeline on it. Needless to say it is very high level but gives you an idea of the start times and duration of our pain!!
TN49 MM-EES-TN049-Schedule-of-construction-works-Attachment-A-Summary-program
The City of Melbourne presented a number of their concerns to the panel last Thursday. The full suite of documents is available here.
I have not done much reading but did read their document on Trees, Parks and Open Space. This one. It is written by a guy who seems to be much more knowledgeable in this matter than all of us.
He only presents the case for City of Melbourne but he does cover the Domain precinct (amongst various City of M areas). It is worth reading. My interpretation is he has some concerns but that with some work he would be OK. It is interesting that he notes that the EPRs (the controls that bind the contractors) seem stronger than the EES on tree removal – that is good news and means fewer trees are likely to go.
For your information this is NOT part of anything that Botanica is involved in. I THINK that the G12 group are behind this action, but not sure.
I personally think that it is very sad that any trees will go but…
Bottom line is…be careful signing petitions without knowing the facts.
If you want to read more then you’ll have to wade through lots of documents, sorry couldn’t find it easily.
You must be logged in to post a comment.